Councilman: 2 Wall Street Banks Have Charged Taxpayers $65 Mil in Predatory Fees

Councilman Paul Koretz is urging NY Mellon Bank and Dexia to release the city from financial deals.

Patch file photo.
Patch file photo.

A Los Angeles city councilman today threatened to stop doing business with two Wall Street banks he says have charged taxpayers $65 million in predatory fees since the 2008 banking meltdown.

Councilman Paul Koretz is urging NY Mellon Bank and Dexia to release the city from financial deals that have led to tens of millions of dollars in fees, with millions more to come.

One interest rate swap deal the city entered into with the two banks in 2006 to pay for wastewater infrastructure projects, along with other deals, are "costing us dearly, even today, while NY Mellon reaps massive profits," Koretz said during a City Hall news conference.

Kevin Heine, spokesman for NY Mellon Bank, did not respond directly to the councilman's statements but said their bank became involved "as part of a competitive bidding process."

The city received an "impartial objective assessment of the economic benefits of the transaction" from an independent financial adviser, he said.

If the city remains in the deals, it could lose another $69 million through 2028, Koretz said. But in order to get out of those arrangements, the city would need to fork over $24 million to the banks, he said.

If the banks refuse to renegotiate with the city or to terminate the deals at no cost, then the city would "consider terminating any current business with these banks and excluding NY Mellon and Dexia from all future business with the city," according to a motion introduced by Koretz.

While the Federal Reserve has artificially slashed interest rates for banks, giving financial institutions "access to cheap money," cities and others obtaining financing from those banks are unable to get out of bad deals without needing to pay fees, according to the motion, which was seconded by Councilman Gil Cedillo.

The potentially costly fees were highlighted in a report released by Fix L.A., a coalition representing Los Angeles residents and city employee unions.

Lisa Cody, an analyst with SEIU Local 721, a union representing city employees, said the report "documents a growing body of evidence suggesting that Wall Street has engaged in predatory lending practices when providing municipal financing to cities and government."

According to the report, the city has already paid $204 million in fees to financial institutions, on top of the $65 million lost when the city got out of other less-than-ideal financing agreements.

NY Mellon and Dexia has "millions of dollars" of business with the city that includes real estate transactions and letters of credit, according to Cody. The banks also act as the custodians for securities lending for the city and the Department of Water and Power, she said.

The city has faced "difficult circumstances" as a result of the financial crisis in 2008, so while the banks may not have intended for the deals to go south, "NY Mellon Bank and Dexia need to do what many others have done for the sake of the city, and that is to make sacrifices and not obscene profits," Koretz said.

The councilman's motion, if approved, tells Office of Finance staff and other city officials to meet with the banks to rework the deals or reach n agreement allowing them to get out of them without needing to pay a penalty. Staffers would be expected to report back on their progress in 30 days.

The motion still needs to work its way through the City Council committees and may take a "month or so" to get to the full council, Koretz said.

The City Council also is amid budget hearings and is expected to hear Monday from city employee unions and City Administrative Officer Miguel Santana's staff on Fix L.A.'s report.

Santana did not respond this week to questions about the report's findings.

--City News Service

Scott Zwartz May 03, 2014 at 03:57 PM
If each council district had 3 councilpersons all elected at large, then we wouldn't be in such a financial mess. whenever one councilperson proposed giving millions to corrupt wall street, there'd be two councilpersons to curry favor with the same voters bringing everything to light. /// A needs to change to a system where we have 12 district and each district has 3 at large councilpersons. When each district has 3 at large councilpersons, no one councilperson can deliver all the votes for his district. The other two will be motivated to bring the corruption to the public's attention. /// Why won't the other two councilpersons be bought off by the billionaires? /// Money is only good if it ends up getting more votes, and the other 2 councilpersons can get more votes by exposing corruption than they can get with extra developer dollars. /// Think of the TV campaign ads. For example, "Councilperson O'Farrell proposed giving Mellon Bank an extra $10 Million of your tax dollars, but I stopped O'Farrell." 3 at large councilpersons per council district provides an inherent check on corruption. Exposing corruption is a proven vote getter
Allan May 04, 2014 at 07:22 AM
Thanks Abe makes sense. "Predatory implies they took advantage of dopes" Well, this council.....and Koretz....well, not sure if a case could be made for predatory, but as far as the dope part.....
coledude May 05, 2014 at 10:09 AM
This is like asking a "Loan Shark" to give you a break. You will get a break but it's going to be in your leg..


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »