Kate Anderson Prepares to Run Against Steve Zimmer

The mother of twins is convinced now is her time.

Kate Anderson is a woman on a mission. The lawyer turned community activist and homemaker is one of four people running against Steve Zimmer for a seat on the Los Angeles Unified School District Board. While she said the LAUSD has its share of challenges, Anderson said she is up to the task.

Anderson first joined the Mar Vista Community Council in 2008 and since then has continued to look for ways to get involved in the community she refers to as a “really phenomenal, very close-knit community.”

“I think the Mar Vista Community Council, like a lot of neighborhood councils throughout Los Angeles, provides a real infrastructure for the community to come together,” Anderson said. “I really believe that neighborhood associations in the community are the building blocks for a civil society, for a democratic society, and I think we have some of the best of that here in Mar Vista.”

Anderson said she is not new to public service. While an undergraduate at UCLA, Anderson worked as an intern for Congressman Henry Waxman.

“So I’ve learned the skills of figuring out what different coalitions need and bringing them together when it seemed like they’re diametrically opposed which is a skill that I think you need,” Anderson said.

In addition to preparing to be a public servant, working for Waxman also helped sway her decision to attend law school, according to Anderson. A graduate of the University of Chicago Law School, Anderson used her skills when she first returned to work at her old law firm, Munger, Tolles, and Olson, after being on maternity leave.

“I was able to get that law firm to open the first childcare center sponsored by a law firm west of the Mississippi and that took a lot of the same skills I learned in Congressman Waxman’s office, figuring out how to build fences, bring people together and get something done,” Anderson said. “I think that’s a skill we really need on the school board right now.”

Another thing that is currently lacking on the school board, in Anderson’s opinion, is more parents whose children would be directly impacted by the decisions the LAUSD board makes. While Anderson refers to Zimmer as a “good person” with a “good heart,” she said she offers something Zimmer does not.

“My priorities are different from his, and my perspective is different from his,” Anderson said of Zimmer. “My daughters go to Mar Vista Elementary which is an LAUSD public school, and they’re getting a tremendous education there, and as a parent I’ve seen what’s right with the education system. I’ve seen the potential for LAUSD, and I’ve also seen what’s wrong with the system and what we need to change.”

Anderson pointed out that of the seven LAUSD board members, only one has children in the LAUSD. She said her daughters are fueling her decision to serve now.

“I think we need a parent’s perspective and a parent’s urgency because these daughters of mine, they’re in third grade now,” Anderson said. “Yesterday, they were in kindergarten, and they’re graduating tomorrow. We don’t have time to wait.”

She is also against Zimmer's resolution on LAUSD teacher evaluations.

"We have a pilot project in LAUSD that Superintendent Deasy has been running to implement a teacher evaluation system. Steve’s resolution would have blocked it, and his response to me was we should just wait," Anderson said. "The assessments are coming in. Let’s just wait a couple of years, and I gave him the answer I gave you, we don’t have a couple of years to wait."

Anderson said she would also be more supportive of charter schools than Zimmer has been yet make sure they are "held accountable."

"There needs to be transparency," she said. "We need to make sure they’re playing by the rules, and where they’re not, we need to enforce those rules, but there are a lot of really tremendous charter schools providing a great education for kids in the district."

Anderson, who unsuccessfully ran for the California State Assembly two years ago against Betsy Butler, said now is the time for her to step up for the sake of her daughters as well as other children in Mar Vista and around Los Angeles.

“I genuinely believe that I can make a difference, and that if I am successful, I will be able to help improve not only my daughters’ education but the education for the hundreds and thousands of kids in LAUSD,” Anderson said.

steve December 03, 2012 at 04:28 PM
I would love to know what she plans to do different? How is she going to change the broken system? How is she going to get class sizes back to the 20 something kids instead of the 35+ What are her plans to allow more Charter Schools, we need them?
Jeanne Kuntz December 03, 2012 at 04:52 PM
I am so excited at the prospect of having Kate Anderson on the LAUSD school board. Her unflagging commitment and genuine humanity combined with years of experience in local politics make her an ideal candidate. As a participant in Mar Vista Community Council board meetings, I am always struck by her calm, reasoned opinions and respect for others. Go Kate!
David Ewing December 03, 2012 at 09:52 PM
There are major accountability problems with LAUSD administration, UTLA, and Charter Schools. We hear from each of these groups about the others' accountability failures, but not a lot about how they plan to improve their own accountability. What I'd like to hear from candidates is how they would get proponents from each of these groups to come up with ways to reform their own organizations to improve accountability.
Linda Lucks December 04, 2012 at 02:39 AM
I like Kate too, and i have come to greatly respect and admire LAUSD Representative Steve Zimmer for the intelligent, deliberate and compassionate way he approaches the issues. During a very difficult period early this year over the issue of co-location of charter schools onto traditional school campuses, he stood out as a steady leader when emotions were high. Heated battles were fought at Venice Neighborhood Council meetings over control of Westminster and Walgrove Schools. Neither Zimmer or The VNC took sides and let the community react, which it did and quite vociferously. The parents at Westminster ultimately did not want a co-location of a charter middle school on their campus when they learned that their children would not necessarily be chosen to attend. They also didn't want to lose their computer room and parent center deemed "non-essential" by the district. The fight over Walgrove was hot and heavy between two charters over space, with the neighbors fighting to oppose any charters there over traffic issues. It was a learning experience for me. How about asking both candidates to stay positive and discuss how they would improve education for all of our children.
Paul December 04, 2012 at 04:04 AM
I guess my worry would be coming from Munger, Tolles, and Olson is Kate a stealth candidate for billionaires to bring charter schools and crush the public schools.
Anne Arikian December 04, 2012 at 07:32 AM
I think Kate would do a terrific job. She is level-headed and responsive to her constituents in her role on the Mar Vista Community Council. Steve Zimmer is blatantly anti-charter to the point of being negligent in his job duties. I for one will be happy to see a more open-minded challenger take his place. (For the record, my children do not attend charter schools, and I appreciate that they are a "mixed-bag", but Zimmer has apparently never met a charter he likes).
Robert D. Skeels December 06, 2012 at 04:13 PM
As a fellow LAUSD candidate, I would like to see Ms. Anderson and her wealthy charter backers explain how they justify the systematic discrimination of children with special needs. http://nepc.colorado.edu/newsletter/2012/12/ny-special-ed
Ann Wexler December 07, 2012 at 01:30 AM
LAUSD typically encroaches 40% of a charter school's special ed budget and provides nothing in return for that, which makes it harder to provide services at the same level as the district. Also, not every district school admits every special ed child -- they have different programs at different schools; hard for a single charter to do that.
Robert D. Skeels December 07, 2012 at 08:36 PM
What a fascinating and mendacious response Ms. Wexler. I suggest you familiarize yourself with the 2009 and 2012 reports by the Office of Independent Monitor which has found that the children with special needs are "significantly underrepresented" at privately managed charter corporations. Given that most CMOs get additional funding to the tune of tens of millions of dollars from right-wing billionaires like the Walton fortune heirs, your arguments about funding are specious at best. Here's a novel concept: any school that takes public funds should be legally, ethically, and morally obligated to educate every child. Wholesale exclusion and discrimination should not be subsidized by the public. Perhaps if charter school boards were elected and accountable to the public, communities would be able to enforce a modicum of ethics on a sector that currently operates with negligible oversight. Here's a collection of resources for families and community members interested in resources on how the lucrative charter industry treats the most vulnerable of our students: http://bitly.com/bundles/rdsathene/4 Social justice demands that charter corporations stop putting their revenue streams and staggering executives salaries ahead of the needs of students.
Ann Wexler December 08, 2012 at 03:29 AM
Before you accuse me of being untruthful, you might check with the LAUSD charter office and ask what their standard contract is with most charter schools. Nor is it untruthful to state that not all district schools educate every child -- they don't, because it's inefficient. For example, a DHH program may be put in one school in an area and then kids will be bused in. Having represented special ed families, I can assure you that traditional district schools have a long way to go to actually meet the needs of special ed kids or to meet the legal requirements for doing so.
Robert D. Skeels December 08, 2012 at 05:06 AM
Please correct me if I'm wrong Ms. Wexler. Your contention is that the lucrative charter industry is entirely absolved of their well documented segregation and abject discrimination because our public schools are less than perfect in their record with special education? While the latter is true, and we need to work on that, the former is entirely inexcusable. That's a pretty indefensible position you're taking if it is indeed what you're saying. However, since our public schools have elected boards and are accountable to the public, we can always push them to improve their special education implementations. Sadly charter schools, with their private, unelected, corporate boards, provide no such access or accountability. Here's an excellent quote from the Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates (COPAA) that sums up this entire subject. "It is not legally or morally acceptable that these so-called “schools of choice” that are concentrated in urban communities and supported with public funds, should be permitted to operate as segregated learning environments where students are more isolated by race, socioeconomic class, disability, and language than the public school district from which they were drawn." — COPAA (Charter Schools and Students with Disabilities p. 42) I for one find charters placing revenue streams and executive salaries ahead of student needs abhorrent and reprehensible.
Sara Roos February 07, 2013 at 10:14 PM
"blatantly anti-charter"? Could the OP please provide examples of such behavior or opinions? Thank you.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something